« La « météorite » du 2 janvier, dans le New Jersey, n'en était pas une » : différence entre les versions

Une nouvelle de Wikinews, la source d'informations que vous pouvez écrire.
[version non vérifiée][version non vérifiée]
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
Skenmy (discuter | contributions)
m add quotes
Ligne 9 : Ligne 9 :
Earlier during the incident, scientists from Rutgers examined the object visually along with police who were at the scene, and determined it was a meteorite. But further tests by geologists confirmed that it was not a meteorite, but probably a metal piece from a rocket or satellite. They had earlier thought it was made of [[w:iron|iron]].
Earlier during the incident, scientists from Rutgers examined the object visually along with police who were at the scene, and determined it was a meteorite. But further tests by geologists confirmed that it was not a meteorite, but probably a metal piece from a rocket or satellite. They had earlier thought it was made of [[w:iron|iron]].


That's the nature of science. If the conclusion from the test says it's not a meteorite, then it's not a meteorite. We have to move forward," said Srinivasan Nageswaran, an individual belonging to the family that found the object.
"That's the nature of science. If the conclusion from the test says it's not a meteorite, then it's not a meteorite. We have to move forward," said Srinivasan Nageswaran, an individual belonging to the family that found the object.


==Related News==
==Related News==

Version du 12 mai 2007 à 19:16

Publié le May 12, 2007

An object that fell through the roof of a New Jersey home in January was not a meteorite, according to Jeremy Delaney a geologist at Rutgers University. Instead, it appears the object was space junk, or orbital debris.

"Basically, it's a piece of stainless steel. There's huge amounts of material that have been left by the various space programs of the world," said Delaney.

The meteorite shaped object was not from a naturally occurring substance and had a silver like reflection. It weighed about the same as a small can of soup, 13 ounces (about .37 kilograms), but was no bigger than a golf ball.

Earlier during the incident, scientists from Rutgers examined the object visually along with police who were at the scene, and determined it was a meteorite. But further tests by geologists confirmed that it was not a meteorite, but probably a metal piece from a rocket or satellite. They had earlier thought it was made of iron.

"That's the nature of science. If the conclusion from the test says it's not a meteorite, then it's not a meteorite. We have to move forward," said Srinivasan Nageswaran, an individual belonging to the family that found the object.

Related News

  • {{{{{langue}}}}} [[:{{{langue}}}:{{{titre}}}|« {{{titre}}} »]]. [[:{{{langue}}}:Main_Page|Wikinews]], January 6, 2007.

Sources

Modèle:Publish