« Modèle:Révision par des pairs » : différence entre les versions
[version non vérifiée] | [version non vérifiée] |
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
+proposed policy |
fix |
||
Ligne 2 : | Ligne 2 : | ||
|image={{ #ifeq: {{{c}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{n}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{v}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{npov}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{s}}} | pass | [[Image:Artículo bueno.svg|40px]] | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} |
|image={{ #ifeq: {{{c}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{n}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{v}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{npov}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{s}}} | pass | [[Image:Artículo bueno.svg|40px]] | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} | [[Image:Red x.svg|40px]] }} |
||
|type={{ #ifeq: {{{c}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{n}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{v}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{npov}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{s}}} | pass | notice | content }} | content }} | content }} | content }} | content }} |
|type={{ #ifeq: {{{c}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{n}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{v}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{npov}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{s}}} | pass | notice | content }} | content }} | content }} | content }} | content }} |
||
|text={{ #ifeq: {{{c}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{n}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{v}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{npov}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{s}}} | pass | {{peer reviewed/Passed|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} |
|text={{ #ifeq: {{{c}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{n}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{v}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{npov}}} | pass | {{ #ifeq: {{{s}}} | pass | {{peer reviewed/Passed|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} | {{peer reviewed/Failed|c={{{c}}}|n={{{n}}}|v={{{v}}}|npov={{{npov}}}|s={{{s}}}|reviewer={{{reviewer}}}|comments={{{comments|No comments were left by the reviewer}}}|time={{{time}}}}} }} |
||
}}</includeonly><noinclude>{{proposed policy}} |
}}</includeonly><noinclude>{{proposed policy}} |
||
==Description== |
==Description== |
Version du 11 août 2008 à 13:14
Description
This template is used to advertise on an article's talk page the status of it being reviewed. It is designed to be simple to use, yet informative.
Use
{{peer reviewed
|c=Status
|n=Status
|v=Status
|npov=Status
|s=Status
|reviewer=Your Username
|comments=Any Comments (signed)
|time=~~~~~}}
Where Status is pass for a passed section, or comments for a failed section.
- c is for Copyright: The reviewer should check that the text and images are not copyright infringement.
- n is for Newsworthiness: The reviewer should check that the article agrees with our content guide and is newsworthy.
- v is for Verifiability: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is fully sourced, (using multiple independent sources is strongly encouraged) or has adequate Original Reporting notes.
- npov is for Neutral Point of View: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is written in a neutral and unbiased manner, with no editorial commentary/advocacy or unsourced opinion.
- s is for Style: The reviewer should check that all information in the article complies with our style guide (on dateline, grammar and spelling, "inverted pyramid" structure, tone, wikilinks, categories, headline... etc.)
Examples
A Passed article would look like:
{{peer reviewed|c=pass|n=pass|v=pass|npov=pass|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=A very good article! --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}
A Failed article would look like:
{{peer reviewed|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}