« Modèle:Révision par des pairs » : différence entre les versions
| [version non vérifiée] | [version non vérifiée] |
create documentation |
m →Examples : code tag |
||
| Ligne 30 : | Ligne 30 : | ||
'''A Failed article would look like:''' |
'''A Failed article would look like:''' |
||
<nowiki>{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}</nowiki> |
<code><nowiki>{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}</nowiki></code> |
||
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif"><strong>[[User:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">Sken</span>]]</strong></span>[[User_talk:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">my</span> <sup>talk</sup>]] 21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)|time=21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)}} |
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif"><strong>[[User:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">Sken</span>]]</strong></span>[[User_talk:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">my</span> <sup>talk</sup>]] 21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)|time=21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)}} |
||
Version du 9 août 2008 à 21:36
Description
This template is used to advertise on an article's talk page the status of it being reviewed. It is designed to be simple to use, yet informative.
Use
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=status|n=status|v=status|npov=status|s=status|reviewer=Your Username|comments=Any Comments|time=~~~~~}}
Where status is pass for a passed section, or comments for a failed section.
- c is for Copyright: The reviewer should check that the text and images are not copyright infringement.
- n is for Newsworthiness: The reviewer should check that the article agrees with our content guide and is newsworthy.
- v is for Verifiability: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is fully sourced, (using multiple independent sources is strongly encouraged) or has adequate Original Reporting notes.
- npov is for Neutral Point of View: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is written in a neutral and unbiased manner, with no editorial commentary/advocacy or unsourced opinion.
- s is for Style: The reviewer should check that all information in the article complies with our style guide (on dateline, grammar and spelling, "inverted pyramid" structure, tone, wikilinks, categories, headline... etc.)
Examples
A Passed article would look like:
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=pass|npov=pass|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=A very good article! --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}
Utilisateur:Skenmy/Reviewer Template
A Failed article would look like:
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}
Utilisateur:Skenmy/Reviewer Template