« Modèle:Révision par des pairs » : différence entre les versions
| [version non vérifiée] | [version non vérifiée] |
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
m better "fail" image |
create documentation |
||
| Ligne 6 : | Ligne 6 : | ||
}} |
}} |
||
</includeonly> |
</includeonly> |
||
<noinclude> |
|||
==Description== |
|||
This template is used to advertise on an article's talk page the status of it being reviewed. It is designed to be simple to use, yet informative. |
|||
==Use== |
|||
<nowiki>{{</nowiki>User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c='''''status'''''|n='''''status'''''|v='''''status'''''|npov='''''status'''''|s='''''status'''''|reviewer='''''Your Username'''''|comments='''''Any Comments'''''|time=<nowiki>~~~~~}}</nowiki> |
|||
Where '''''status''''' is '''''pass''''' for a passed section, or comments for a failed section. |
|||
*'''c''' is for '''Copyright''': The reviewer should check that the text and images are not copyright infringement. |
|||
*'''n''' is for '''Newsworthiness''': The reviewer should check that the article agrees with our [[Wikinews:Content guide#Write news articles|content guide]] and is newsworthy. |
|||
*'''v''' is for '''Verifiability''': The reviewer should check that all information in the article is fully [[Wikinews:Cite sources|sourced]], (using multiple independent sources is strongly encouraged) or has adequate Original Reporting notes. |
|||
*'''npov''' is for '''Neutral Point of View''': The reviewer should check that all information in the article is written in a [[Wikinews:Neutral point of view|neutral and unbiased]] manner, with no editorial commentary/advocacy or unsourced opinion. |
|||
*'''s''' is for '''Style''': The reviewer should check that all information in the article complies with our [[Wikinews:Style guide|style guide]] (on [[Wikinews:Style guide#Using the Date and Dateline templates|dateline]], grammar and [[Wikinews:Style guide#Spelling|spelling]], [[Wikinews:Style guide#The first paragraph|"inverted pyramid" structure]], [[Wikinews:Style guide#Writing tone and structure|tone]], [[Wikinews:Style guide#Wiki links within an article|wikilinks]], [[Wikinews:Style guide#Wikinews Categories|categories]], [[Wikinews:Naming conventions|headline]]... etc.) |
|||
==Examples== |
|||
'''A Passed article would look like:''' |
|||
<code><nowiki>{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=pass|npov=pass|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=A very good article! --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}</nowiki></code> |
|||
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=pass|npov=pass|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=A very good article! --<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif"><strong>[[User:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">Sken</span>]]</strong></span>[[User_talk:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">my</span> <sup>talk</sup>]] 21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)|time=21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''A Failed article would look like:''' |
|||
<nowiki>{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}</nowiki> |
|||
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif"><strong>[[User:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">Sken</span>]]</strong></span>[[User_talk:Skenmy|<span style="color:orange;">my</span> <sup>talk</sup>]] 21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)|time=21:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)}} |
|||
</noinclude> |
|||
Version du 9 août 2008 à 21:35
Description
This template is used to advertise on an article's talk page the status of it being reviewed. It is designed to be simple to use, yet informative.
Use
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=status|n=status|v=status|npov=status|s=status|reviewer=Your Username|comments=Any Comments|time=~~~~~}}
Where status is pass for a passed section, or comments for a failed section.
- c is for Copyright: The reviewer should check that the text and images are not copyright infringement.
- n is for Newsworthiness: The reviewer should check that the article agrees with our content guide and is newsworthy.
- v is for Verifiability: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is fully sourced, (using multiple independent sources is strongly encouraged) or has adequate Original Reporting notes.
- npov is for Neutral Point of View: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is written in a neutral and unbiased manner, with no editorial commentary/advocacy or unsourced opinion.
- s is for Style: The reviewer should check that all information in the article complies with our style guide (on dateline, grammar and spelling, "inverted pyramid" structure, tone, wikilinks, categories, headline... etc.)
Examples
A Passed article would look like:
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=pass|npov=pass|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=A very good article! --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}
Utilisateur:Skenmy/Reviewer Template
A Failed article would look like:
{{User:Skenmy/Reviewer_Template|c=pass|n=pass|v=Many of the claims made are not backed up by sources|npov=Appears to be biased|s=pass|reviewer=Skenmy|comments=Otherwise a very good article. --~~~~|time=~~~~~}}
Utilisateur:Skenmy/Reviewer Template