Différences entre versions de « Utilisateur:AlexandrDmitri/Traduction »

Sauter à la navigation Sauter à la recherche
D'autres avertissements et interwiki pour version originale
(Création de la page de traduction)
 
(D'autres avertissements et interwiki pour version originale)
'''CECI EST UNE ÉBAUCHE DE TRADUCTION. ELLE EST LOIN D'ÊTRE TERMINÉE, ELLE N'A PAS ÉTÉ RELUE, ET LE WIKICODE NE FONCTIONNE PAS ENCORE. JE N'AI PAS MIS NON PLUS DES MODÈLES DE FR-WIKINEWS'''
'''LES SOURCES MANQUENT ÉGALEMENT, AINSI QUE LES LIENS'''
 
'''VERSION ANGLAISE DISPONIBLE VIA L'INTERWIKI'''
{{date|December 15, 2009}}{{develop|do not change to review unless Brian McNeil is run over by a bus or kidnapped by aliens! Several email queries are still outstanding.}}
=== Lede ===
[[File:Chetbakermonument.jpg|200px|left|thumb|Monument à [[w:Chet Baker|Chet Baker]] à [[w:Amsterdam|Amsterdam]]. {{image credit|Jeroen Coert}}]][[File:Cria logo.gif|340px|thumb|right|Logo du CRIA, l’organisation qui représente les quatre entreprises citées comme défendants.]]
{{Q|Prof. Geist tries to taint the recording industry as blatant copyright infringers, without ever delving into the industry wide accepted custom for clearing mechanical rights. The pending list system, which has been around for decades, represents an agreed upon industry wide consensus that songwriters, music publishers (who represent songwriters) and the recording industry use and rely on to ensure that music gets released and to the market efficiently and the proper copyright owners get compensated.}}
This characterisation of the pending list only matching "has been around for decades" with that of SODRAC's Basskin, a lawyer, going into great detail on the major labels resisting twenty years of collective societies fighting, and failing, to negotiate a situation where the labels take adequate measures to mechanically license works and pay due fees, royalties, and due interest.
[[en:Payment pending; Canadian recording industry set for six billion penalties?]]

Menu de navigation